Avoiding the term diversity in favor of language that emphasises inclusiveness is the most common path taken because there is little resistance to the belief that everyone already at the table should have a voice. The road less traveled, as described by poet Robert Frost can make all of the difference when an organization is willing to address both diversity and inclusiveness. The resistance to bring different people to the table is universal, and our affinity bias encourages us to choose people with whom we identify. Diversity of thought and experience is the goal, knowing that the more talent in different areas a group possesses, the more versatile, creative and capable. Race, gender, economic, and educational markers are classically used as surrogates for diversity. There is an unfortunate stronger force that opposes using some markers of diversity for fear of reverse discrimination, and therefore the path of inclusiveness is chosen.